Seeing the Big Picture: Student Development Theory & Admissions

Discover how three leading student development theories can have a significant impact on how you shape your incoming classes for success.

The purpose of admissions, across institutions, is to process applications and admit applications in the hopes that they will become students. But how does the criteria these future students are evaluated against align with student success and retention?

In this article, we’ll look at how we can utilize an existing body of knowledge – student development theory in conjunction with competency-based admissions – to attract, admit and retain students who will truly thrive in your unique school environment.

Student Development Theory

Student Development Theory is a body of knowledge that has developed ideas surrounding how students succeed during their time in post-secondary. It is a growing knowledge base that informs many student services professionals in their practices and many student life offices at higher education institutions.  

The Major Players

Astin’s Theory of Involvement

Astin’s Theory of Involvement identifies that students who are involved on-campus have higher rates of success in college or university. He determined that a student’s development was directly related to the quantity and quality of student involvement.

“Student involvement refers to the amount of physical and psychological energy that the student devotes to the academic experience,” (Astin p. 297 1984).

In order for admissions teams to utilize Astin’s Theory of Involvement, they would need to recruit applicants based on their likelihood to become involved on-campus. This would lead to looking for certain competencies in students, including motivation, time management, and leadership.

How competency-based admissions can help admit involved students following Astin’s Theory of Involvement

The following ideas will help you determine how to revamp your competency-based admissions processes to include Astin’s Theory of Involvement.

  1. Work with your student services to determine which types of students are currently most likely to be engaged on-campus.
    1. Connect with your director of student services, or the co-curricular activities office, they will most likely have data on which students are most involved in your programming.
  2. If you want to expand your diversity, look into what programs and offices should be created or expanded to engage students that are not currently involved outside of the classroom.
    1. Before you admit a cohort filled with students that are not typically represented on your campus, ensure that the supports are there for these students to be actively involved on-campus.
  3. Ensure that the students you are admitting have ways to get involved on-campus. Take their interests and aspirations into account at the admissions stage.
    1. If you admit 200 applicants who were Editor-In-Chief of their high school newspaper, but your school only has one student publication with a staff of 20, you may be already disengaging students at the admissions stage.

 

Tinto’s Theory of Student Departure

Tinto’s Theory of Student Departure investigates student retention. He believes that students leave their studies before graduating because of the interactions they have with the university. These interactions can fall into four different categories: academic, social, intellectual integration, or a weak commitment to college or university.

Tinto recognizes that all students come to campus with specific characteristics, backgrounds, passions, and expectations. He also recognizes that every institution has unique characteristics and finding a good “fit” between applicants and institutions is key to student retention.

While the admissions teams duties may end at finding good “fit” applicants, he also believes that it is the institution’s responsibility to provide opportunities for students to integrate socially, intellectually, and to succeed academically, outside of just offering courses.

Read: New Stanford Research Looks at How Cultural Differences Could Impact Applicant “Fit”

The link between admissions teams and student services is key to student retention.

How competency-based admissions can help retain students following Tinto’s Theory of Student Departure

The following steps will provide some actionable items that you and your team can take to implement Tinto’s Theory of Student Departure into your competency-based admissions processes.

  1. Determine the General Academic Competencies that your applicants need to succeed academically with your faculty.
    1. Work with faculty to determine what really is expected of students in their first-year classes, such as what skills they absolutely need to successfully complete and be engaged in their courses.
  2. Determine (Inter)Personal Competencies and Traits with your student services staff.
    1. Student services staff (or student life professionals) will have the most insight into what programming is offered on-campus outside of the classroom. They will be able to help you determine which types of students they can support, through offices like those that offer services for international and indigenous students or co-curricular and leadership programming.
  3. Determine Subject-Related Knowledge & Skills with the faculty or program directors of the specific programs that applicants are applying to. Or even bring in current students or alumni!
    1. Speak with current students or alumni about what specific knowledge they needed when they entered the program to help determine which competencies to assess applicants on during admissions.

 

Sanford’s Theory of Challenge and Support

Sanford’s Theory of Challenge and Support investigates how to keep students engaged during their time at college or university. If they have too much challenge and not enough support, they could “retreat”, which can lead to apprehension and unproductive stress.

Similarly, if a student has too much support but not enough challenge, they can become stagnant.

The objective is to provide the adequate amount of challenge and support to lead to “maximum growth”.

Admissions teams are looking for students who will engage with their school at this cross-section of support and challenge to allow maximum growth for all students.

When a student reaches maximum growth they are less likely to transfer or drop-out, increasing the school’s completion rates, which in turn recruiters can use to attract applicants to their school.

How to use competency-based admissions to help ensure students reach maximum growth

Below are two examples of how to assess for competencies during the admissions process that would help ensure that admitted applicants will reach maximum growth through challenge and support.

Example 1

A bustling city campus that does not have that many student clubs, where students do not have a dedicated academic or co-curricular counselor. Mostly a commuter school.

Potential Competencies: global mindedness to navigate the diversity of the city and the student body, motivation to seek out new opportunities because there is not going to be someone supporting them through every step, and strong communication skills to be able to explain what they want to learn and accomplish while a student at your institution.

If you were to admit students without the above competencies, they could potentially feel too challenged at your institution because they were expecting additional support. This could lead to disengagement and potential departure before degree completion.

Example 2

A small liberal arts school located in a rural town where the average class size is 10 and students regularly meet with a counselor to ensure that they are not only successful in school but they are successful outside of the classroom. Students are required to complete volunteer work for reduced tuition fees.

Potential Competencies: volunteerism as all students have to help out in the school community as part of their graduation requirements, engagement as all students are an instrumental part of the school community, and empathy as the small student body means that successful students will have to be able to get along with a close-knit group of students.

If you were to admit students without the above competencies, they could feel overwhelmed by the interconnectedness of campus. This could lead to disengagement and potential departure before degree completion.

 

Moving Forward

Some schools and admissions teams may view competency-based admissions as an interesting idea, but they are not willing to take the plunge to utilize it to its fullest extent.

Through leaning on theories that already mold our education systems, you are better able to introduce a new practice into your admissions processes with proven results.

While the above tips will take many stakeholders and potentially years to fully introduce into your practices, it will allow you to better understand your institution, which types of programming you should offer for students to succeed, and which types of competencies successful students need to possess to become engaged students and alumni of your institution.


Make your admissions process more human.

Over 300 programs are using the world's first holistic admissions solution to select the best-fit students for their classes.

Learn More
Search
Generic filters
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Search in comments
Filter by Custom Post Type

Share This Content

Must read articles in the admissions space, delivered straight to your inbox.

Ask us anything

or jump on a call

We'll get back to you as fast as humanly possible :)